DHTML Menu / JavaScript Menu Powered by Milonic
Already a member? Sign In

Village Journals help
Resonate your identity with Naseeb journals. Express your opinions, share your thoughts, post your writings and connect with like minded people through the power of expression.

1400 years of erosion


I read an article not too long ago about the negative effects of inbreeding among Saudis. One professor mentioned that he could tell where his students were from based upon symptoms they exhibited during his classes. For example many of his students couldnt stay awake due to severe anemia. There were alot of other important statistics. %40 of the Saudi population suffers from some form of bloodborn illness such as anemia. 1 in 10 children is stillborn. This is a result of centuries of inbreeding. Vitaligo and Lupus are also rampant in the population. The government says that they are taking the necessary steps to promote genetic diversity (within the Saudi population of course). The problem is, that why would you promote the crossbreeding amongst two or more genetically degraded populations? Outside experts indicate that it may be too late. Does anyone else see the detriments to the Muslim community as a whole? When the average non-muslim thinks of Muslims they think of Saudis. I.E. the Saudis have become somewhat the face of Islam around the world. What they see are people who are genetically unfit for war or progress and they laugh. I think they should invest some of their oil billions in a gene splicer and genetic material.
 

Add Comments

 
Add
 

  Comments on this journal

Login to find out (April 26, 2005 at 2:24pm)
interesting pt ifrit made re: human sacrafice. the suadi gov't's eagerness to enforce capital punishment is not in the sunnah, rather the frequent beheadings draws a strong parellel to the days of human sacrafices. to appease the ficticious desire of "God", it was once seen by many cultures that human blood needed to be spilt publically, in the name of God(s) to ward off His wrath. this is bidda! it is not in the spirit of islam to have the death penalty as rampant as it is in suadi. it was a rareity during the days of the rasoolullah (sas) and his companions (ra). why do we(muslims) allow this?
 
Login to find out (April 20, 2005 at 7:55pm)
wahabbis were into human sacrfice and what have you. Until the Brits came along, the Wahabbi notion of Islam was loose to say the least. they are unfit for anything except menial labor. we should form a geneatocracy and boot the Sauuds.
 
Login to find out (April 20, 2005 at 6:51pm)
yes, as ramsey noted, suadi is "a pillar of hypocrisy".
 
Login to find out (April 20, 2005 at 6:48pm)
its especially strange how wahabi/salafi types will still defend saudi as the model islamic state!?!?! despite the monarchy even! its also weird how they are real stingy w/ whom they grant suadi citizenship too. they should be eager for new blood to come into their population if not for the sake of gentic need soley. they may be rich in oil and $$$, but when it comes to good sense and a healthy gene pool, they are impoverished.
 
Login to find out (April 20, 2005 at 5:18pm)
I think Z and I are in agreement. The Sauds dont really beleive in anything that they supposedly represent. They instigate conflict and pretend they had nothing to do with it, and they laugh. Their favorite seems to be smiling in the face of the US and secretly funding and encouraging fundamentalist freaks to slay innocence. Is it just me, or is it time for this establishment to be torn down?
 
Login to find out (April 20, 2005 at 5:00pm)
while their religious police are beating women for not covering up; they're in their palaces snorting coke and screwing their russian prostitutes. its sad. but i think most muslims are aware of this... just not the outsiders: as ifrit said
 
Login to find out (April 20, 2005 at 1:13pm)
hey not all saudis are perfect too!. Most of them cant even run after a dog.

- J