Active Teaching in a JE
Excerpt from my latest JE (#15 from the start. Titled)
The Second Consecuitive Ramadan with a Lunar Eclipse
The book "Nothing in this Book is True, but it is Exactly How Things Are" by Frissell www.amazon.com s=books& n=507846) also discusses this knowledge.. but from a more historical and, refreshingly, skeptical perspective. Breathing exercises for merkabah-energy activation and the true origin of the actual multimensional Star of David are also explained. The Flower of Life, which is essentially a construct explainable with Buckminister Fuller's 4-dimensional axis system is also dissected in a most elementary way. We are shown how mathematics nowadays lies to us by suggesting that we inhabit 3-dimensional space. "Putting us in a box", so to speak. Well, come outside of it, and see how the true box is a tetrahedron (maximum efficiency, like in nature, e.g., the structure of a virus.). The 4th axis is hidden from our view by pointing it straight at us, from (0, 0, 0, 0) Origin point, straight at our "I" (you can read that as "eye" if you don't realize that "I" is the conscious-essence of YOU). The remaining three axes look like they have 90 degree angles between them, and that a 4th perpendicular axis isn't possible. Of course it isn't! That's not how nature has designed it. Stack 4 marbles in a 4-sided triangle, and then connect their cores to the empty center point between all the marbles. You've got the 4-dimensional axis system, and the empty point at the center of the tetrahedron is the true point of origin. Nature uses it along the lines of the Radial Co-ordinate system.
All the angles between the axes reveal themselves to be 120 degrees, not the sputrid 90 you and I were taught in school! How unnatural that would be! Does nature give us any example of 90 degree construction? I might have to continue this line of reasoning below (or start a new JE) just to explain this crucial piece of mind-liberating info. This book is a totally worthy read for anyone interested in questions that aren't readily answerable in 'conventional' circles.
The Second Consecuitive Ramadan with a Lunar Eclipse
The book "Nothing in this Book is True, but it is Exactly How Things Are" by Frissell www.amazon.com s=books& n=507846) also discusses this knowledge.. but from a more historical and, refreshingly, skeptical perspective. Breathing exercises for merkabah-energy activation and the true origin of the actual multimensional Star of David are also explained. The Flower of Life, which is essentially a construct explainable with Buckminister Fuller's 4-dimensional axis system is also dissected in a most elementary way. We are shown how mathematics nowadays lies to us by suggesting that we inhabit 3-dimensional space. "Putting us in a box", so to speak. Well, come outside of it, and see how the true box is a tetrahedron (maximum efficiency, like in nature, e.g., the structure of a virus.). The 4th axis is hidden from our view by pointing it straight at us, from (0, 0, 0, 0) Origin point, straight at our "I" (you can read that as "eye" if you don't realize that "I" is the conscious-essence of YOU). The remaining three axes look like they have 90 degree angles between them, and that a 4th perpendicular axis isn't possible. Of course it isn't! That's not how nature has designed it. Stack 4 marbles in a 4-sided triangle, and then connect their cores to the empty center point between all the marbles. You've got the 4-dimensional axis system, and the empty point at the center of the tetrahedron is the true point of origin. Nature uses it along the lines of the Radial Co-ordinate system.
All the angles between the axes reveal themselves to be 120 degrees, not the sputrid 90 you and I were taught in school! How unnatural that would be! Does nature give us any example of 90 degree construction? I might have to continue this line of reasoning below (or start a new JE) just to explain this crucial piece of mind-liberating info. This book is a totally worthy read for anyone interested in questions that aren't readily answerable in 'conventional' circles.


