DHTML Menu / JavaScript Menu Powered by Milonic
Already a member? Sign In

Village Journals help
Resonate your identity with Naseeb journals. Express your opinions, share your thoughts, post your writings and connect with like minded people through the power of expression.

Ardent athiest Anthony Flew accepts ID


abcnews.go.com

NEW YORK Dec 9, 2004 ? A British philosophy professor who has been a leading champion of atheism for more than a half-century has changed his mind. He now believes in God more or less based on scientific evidence, and says so on a video released Thursday.

...

"I'm thinking of a God very different from the God of the Christian and far and away from the God of Islam, because both are depicted as omnipotent Oriental despots, cosmic Saddam Husseins," he said. "It could be a person in the sense of a being that has intelligence and a purpose, I suppose."

...

Yet biologists' investigation of DNA "has shown, by the almost unbelievable complexity of the arrangements which are needed to produce (life), that intelligence must have been involved," Flew says in the new video, "Has Science Discovered God?"

abcnews.go.com

==============================

Flew's yet confused state of mind as to what really to believe www.secweb.org
 

Add Comments

 
Add
 

  Comments on this journal

Login to find out (September 9, 2005 at 12:42am)
Flew's beliefs dont personally matter much to me either ... i put up this article to highlight the fact that even a lifetime ardent atheist could agree to the relevance of a Designer ... which holds true regardless of the quoted author's skewed views about atheism and "responsible scholarship" ...let's see if Flew changes his views ...... interesting link nevertheless, i'll put this one up for a reference...
 
Login to find out (September 8, 2005 at 6:15pm)
His belief is not of interest to me here, but in reference to ID, his rationale was this:

"My one and only piece of relevant evidence is the apparent impossibility of providing a naturalistic theory of the origin from DNA of the first reproducing species ... the only reason which I have for beginning to think of believing in a First Cause god is the impossibility of providing a naturalistic account of the origin of the first reproducing organisms."

When referred to the relevant material on that subject, including modern developments:

"I now realize that I have made a fool of myself by believing that there were no presentable theories of the development of inanimate matter up to the first living creature capable of reproduction."

I wouldn't put much stock into Flew's acceptance of ID.
www.secweb.org