Danish Boycott!!!!
Of course all of us know what the Danish newspaper published about our beloved prophet (PBUH) and we also know about the call for boycott that spread world wide. Before I proceed with my question, I would like to lay down these facts:
1- Customers have the right to freely choose to buy or boycott any products.
2- People have the right to express their opinions and feelings the way they want as long as they don't commit violent actions and don't lie.
3- Politicians, religious figures, historic figures, prophets and all kinds of beliefs were subjected to all kinds of sarcasm, ridiculing and criticism (objective and none) across the board in all western media. This was never considered a crime by western standards.
4- The press is really free in western world. (of course there are exceptions)
5- Opinions expressed in any newspaper in any country don't represent that of the people of this country or its government.
Now the questions are:
1- Why did we demand apology from the Danish government?
2- Why did we boycott the entire country and not just the sponsors of the newspaper?
3- What are the objectives of the boycott and at what point do we claim that the mission was accomplished?
4- The newspaper abused its right to express its opinions, don't you think that we abused our right to boycott by punishing the wrong people?
5- Six other newspapers published the same comics, do we want to make it a fight with the entire west or just those who disrespect our feelings?
6- Don't you think that there is a difference between ridiculing one's beliefs and religious figures on one hand and attacking a certain race or ethnicity?
Am I the only one thinking in this direction.
1- Customers have the right to freely choose to buy or boycott any products.
2- People have the right to express their opinions and feelings the way they want as long as they don't commit violent actions and don't lie.
3- Politicians, religious figures, historic figures, prophets and all kinds of beliefs were subjected to all kinds of sarcasm, ridiculing and criticism (objective and none) across the board in all western media. This was never considered a crime by western standards.
4- The press is really free in western world. (of course there are exceptions)
5- Opinions expressed in any newspaper in any country don't represent that of the people of this country or its government.
Now the questions are:
1- Why did we demand apology from the Danish government?
2- Why did we boycott the entire country and not just the sponsors of the newspaper?
3- What are the objectives of the boycott and at what point do we claim that the mission was accomplished?
4- The newspaper abused its right to express its opinions, don't you think that we abused our right to boycott by punishing the wrong people?
5- Six other newspapers published the same comics, do we want to make it a fight with the entire west or just those who disrespect our feelings?
6- Don't you think that there is a difference between ridiculing one's beliefs and religious figures on one hand and attacking a certain race or ethnicity?
Am I the only one thinking in this direction.



Comments on this journal
http:muhammad.masyouth.org (past and copy)
and here is an article about the move on Islamonline today: www.islamonline.net
Allahu a3lam if this is true..
Please forward.
CAIR-CA: PUBLIC INVITED TO 'EXPLORE THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD' - TOP
(SANTA CLARA, CA, 2/8/06) - On Sunday, February 19, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Community Association (MCA) will hold an educational program titled "Explore the life of Muhammad" in Santa Clara, Ca.
The program will review the life and teachings of the prophet Muhammad and discuss the Muslim community's reaction to the publications of defamatory cartoons in Europe. The event is open to the public and will include a presentation and educational materials on the Prophet Muhammad.
WHAT: Explore the Life of Muhammad
WHEN: Sunday, February 19, 2:00pm to 4:00pm. (Pacific)
WHERE: Muslim Community Association, 3003 Scott Blvd., Santa Clara, CA
CONTACT: CAIR Outreach Coordinator Sameena Usman, 408-986-9874, E-Mail: [email protected]
SEE ALSO:
CAIR-SAN DIEGO: ISLAMIC CENTER TO HOLD EVENT ABOUT PROPHET MUHAMMAD - TOP
WHAT: On February 19, the Islamic Center of San Diego will have an event called "The Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him): The Man. . .The Message" to educate the community about Prophet Muhammad and his message. They will also have a Mosque Open House that is designed to help people of all faiths gain a better understanding of the positive role Islam can play in American society.
WHEN: Sunday, February 19, 3 to 5 p.m.
WHERE: Islamic Center of San Diego - 7050 Eckstrom Avenue, San Diego, CA 92111
CONTACT: Call 858-278-5240 (General Inquiries). 619-913-0719 (Media Only).
Photo/Sound Opportunity: The event will showcase various beautiful Islamic decorations and informational posters that will be all over the Islamic Center. There will also be a performance of a nasheed (naw-sheed) or Islamic song by the local Muslim Girl Scouts.
I applaud what CAIR does.
www.topix.net
I wonder how this whole situation will be contained....
I think we will not come to a suitable solutions, other than to continue to educate others about who we are, and form committees (such as the one headed by Sheikh Al-Qaradawi) for "sound" action plans in the future and proactive response mechanisms.
edition.cnn.com
news.independent.co.uk
but if you are not a subscriber to the independent, you can find the article in Hananabanana's Journal:
naseeb.com uid=27224931483097& isFriend=False& isFwd=True)
www.msnbc.msn.com
www.amrkhaled.net
www.timesonline.co.uk
Here are some quotes:
"To imply that some great issue of censorship is raised by the Danish cartoons is nonsense. They were offensive and inflammatory. The best policy would have been to apologise and shut up."
"The question is not whether Muslims should or should not ?grow up? or respect freedom of speech. It is whether we truly want to share a world in peace with those who have values and religious beliefs different from our own."
"Offending an opponent has long been a feature of polemics, just as challenging the boundaries of taste has been a feature of art. It is rightly surrounded by legal and ethical palisades. These include the laws of libel and slander and concepts such as fair comment, right of reply and not stirring racial hatred. None of them is absolute. All rely on the exercise of judgment by those in positions of power. All rely on that bulwark of democracy, tolerance of the feelings of others. This was encapsulated by Lord Clark in his defining quality of civilisation: courtesy."
"The best defence of free speech can only be to curb its excess and respect its courtesy."
about the link. i am reading between the lines of this muslim person who lives in Denmark. someone i know lives in Denmark told me that many people are racist. muslims are minority over there and they just want to protect themselves from mad people. so he got to say that, but we don't really know what's inside his heart.
yes hany, that is the key thing... in today's khutba, the imam was saying that one Danish Muslim businessman will sponsor a series of TV programs about our Prophet, etc... that is perfect, yet I didn't find it anywhere online..
Gigo:
? 1) we lack the skill of planning
2) we mainly react and are hardly ever proactive
3) there needs to be a leader?
You said it all...couldn?t agree more...which reminds me that we need to educate ourselves first as we aspire to educate others about our faith..
NewCairo:
I think you meant that we should exercise self-restraint when reacting... forgiveness shouldn't stop us from defending our dignity and values? but it should come after we do that... remember what our Prophet did when he entered Makaah..
Mohamedadaly:?they were indifferent to our feelings and assumed that we shouldn?t get angry coz of these drawings coz, as they say, Jesus PBUH is being drawn on a daily basis?
That was in mind? yet when I read what an eyewitness has to say, I discovered the double-standard... Here is an excerpt from www.islamonline.net
"There are other examples in Denmark, such as when an artist drew a dirty painting of a naked Jesus and it was taken away immediately, and rightly so. Denmark has laws against blasphemy that protect the honor of the regent and private citizens. Law 266b forbids insulting racial and degrading public remarks and propaganda against a group of persons on the basis of their religion."
Read what the Danish PM says here www.msnbc.msn.com
---
Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said the issue had gone beyond a row between Copenhagen and the Muslim world and now centered on Western free speech versus taboos in Islam, which is now the second religion in many European countries.
?We are talking about an issue with fundamental significance to how democracies work,? Rasmussen told the Copenhagen daily Politiken. ?One can safely say it is now an even bigger issue.?
---
So, it's not just about one editor or a single newspaper.
Apologize if I repeated any of the opinions below, but I couldn't read everything.
making a big deal of it will increase the hate between the west and the east and makes things more complicated.
those who burn the Denmark flag have decided that the whole people in Denmark are involve in this crime. Flag represent the identity of their country which bring more people to hate Islam. those who have done that forgot that there are muslim minority who lives in Denmark that may get hurt because of that. i just saw some picture of letting some arab kids walk on the Denmark flag, that's very childish act and unresponsible. what will be your feeling or reaction when you see some people burn your love country or walk on it.
and the way we react toward the cartoon will not solve the problem, but it will increase "subborn " behavior among the Europe nations. As a result of our "emotional" respond the insulting of the prophet Muhammad (S) has been insulted again in German. so we actually encouraged some other people to insult our prophet (S) again.
and my question is do muslims react from their own? or should always return to the Quran for answer ? here is what people have done and here is what God says :
Al-Baqarah 2:109
"Many of the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) wish that if they could turn you away as disbelievers after you have believed, out of envy from their ownselves, even, after the truth (that Muhammad Peace be upon him is All?h's Messenger) has become manifest unto them. But forgive and overlook, till All?h brings His Command. Verily, All?h is Able to do all things. "
Al-Ma'idah 5:13
" ...... But forgive them, and overlook (their misdeeds). Verily, All?h loves Al?Muhsin?n (good?doers) "
Al-Hijr 15:85
" And We created not the heavens and the earth and all that is between them except with truth, and the Hour is surely coming, so overlook (O Muhammad ), their faults with gracious forgiveness. "
Az-Zukhruf 43:
"So turn away from them (O Muhammad ), and say: Sal?m (peace)! But they will come to know. "
On the other hand, as you said, we should have a vision for this action, and we shouldnt get sweeped by the movement. One possible goal is to fire the EIC of that newspaper, coz as long as the PM is not responsible for what the press writes, and this is true, and so his apology is meaningless, then the one who did that act should pay for his deeds.