Resonate your identity with Naseeb journals. Express your opinions, share your thoughts, post your writings and connect with like minded people through the power of expression.
but! one can also argue that by selecting one, two or a few specimens, even if they select it at random, and clone it away. they would be artificially granting an advantage to that speciments specific genetic makeup- thereby effectively bottlenecking the population. assuming each white tiger (or whatever) produces 2 cubs, making 7 copies of 1 of the tigers automatically gives it 14 cubs, thereby decreasing overall genepool by monopolizing 1 child bearing pair,(they clone both male and female), while increasing the fitness of the clones. so in 100 generations nearly all the white tigers will be decendants of a clone.
at this point, a clone is better than nothing at all. I se eyour point, but they aren't going out and killing all be 1 specimen and cloning it, they are working in a genepool that has already been reduced in size, they aren't actively making it any smaller
Comments on this journal