comments ya Shia?

al-Khou'i was a complete pervert, i'm telling u, he wasn't an easy man (stinking sac of onions I must correct myself -Iranians love eating onions, lol)

check out this fatwa of his >>> www.almjos.com

Q: "is it permissible to insist on kicking out the maid from the house, since my husband sleeps with every maid I bring home?"

Answer (by the infamous Khou'i):
"The wife should care about her husband's rights, as she also is allowed to ask the husband to kick out the maid whenever she wants".

You know, what surprises me is how short the answers of Shia scholars are on the questions their receive on their websites!!!!!!!! It's like they are extremely busy with something (mut'ah? is there a line-up outside his door??)!! No, I think he just doesn't care about the Shia commoners, as long as enough Khums is coming his way!!!

Just check how Sunni Salafis answer the questions here >>> islam-qa.com , look at the lengths of answers, the introductions in almost every one and how the shaikhs takes on the matter step by step, building up knowledge for the reader gradually until he (the reader) is fully enlightened or even 'consoled' if the question contained some utterances on the part of the questioner where he mentions misery or sadness or loss (physical or material).

who cares? sunnis (muslims) do.

Ibn Taymiyah said the truth: "Ahlus Sunnah are the most merciful of God's creation...with His creation - Ahlus Sunnah ar7amul khalqi bil khalq".

I definitely pity the ignorant shia masses, and i'm definitely driven by a will to guide them to the true Islam, but when i see how stubborn they are and insincere I stopped caring for anything but to disgrace them and declare Islam's disowning of them.

keeper bro, these pieces of shiites should know i'd never risk losing my credibility ever, not in front of them nor in front of friends even! if they really have the ability to comprehend, they must have read me MANY TIMES asking them to bring an arab shia and go check every proof i put against them!!! or check shia arabic websites for answers or justifications for the sickness we see in such pages as the ones above, but they either never did bring an arab shia for aid, or they did and found i was right!! :)

i've searched for their major books online, in english, and i searched in cities around me for a shia bookstore but i can't find the books i have pages scanned from them!!! i thinkt his is deliberate, so that they keep their followers 'in the dark', keep taking their khums and their women in mut'ah!!!

rest assured that the arab shia can't explain all these documents we show, i have hundreds of them! what do the shia answer us with??? scanned pages from books by sunni writers (mostly ones from egypt, i'.e., with 'shaky' background on the shia and science of hadith) citing a weak hadith that ascribes things to ali, then when the book is printed in a new edition and the hadith is omitted (after being found to be 'weak'), the shia say: "AH HA, LOOK AT THE NASIBIS!!! GOTCHA!!!" lol, i sweaer man!!!! they think we take our religion from weak or fabricated narrations like them!!! i swear to god if 9 out of 10 hadiths existed in favour of abu bakr..were found to be weak, we'd spread that bit of info and stop citing those hadiths!!! but these cowards think we're like them!!! they ignore a hadith on the authority of ali (their "1st imam") in saheeh muslim about probhibiting mut'ah...and take the hadith int he same book by a sahabi they call "apostate" only because the narration says 'omar forbade mut'ah'!!! picking and choosing shamelessly!!!

u think we'd fabricate proofs against u, shia??? why, do we have no real proofs in order to fabricate ones???? it's u who fabricates lies, against ibn abdulwahhab, against salafis, sunnis in general!! we are in absolutely no need to fabricate one lie against u!! :) soem of us would mix up between ur various sects like claiming u r the sect of "Ali-Elahi"s, but u may refuse to admit u worship ali and ahlulbayt, but everything proves that u do!

i found recently an audio where they call the 'mahdi' the son of Allah!!!!

Mehnaz, it's right out of the book, there is no graphic interfacing fiddling around with it. You'rer not much smarter if you believe that Ahmad Ibn Hanbal is the decendant of a jew in the aother article.

Besides, how well is your arabic, if you read it you'll realize he isn't making this up, it's right out of the page.

the keeper, youre really stupid if you believe this, thats all im gonna say.

they can't say anything bad about their marjia! their marjia enslave them, loot them (take a khums), and sleep with their daughters, sisters, and mothers and aunts :) can slavery get any worse?? and they even love it, the shia laymen! loooooooooool wow, marjias must be on cloud nine always :) over the mooooooooooon!

keeper bro, like their arab brethren on the arabic forums i get these documents from,..naseeb's rafidah will keep silent :)

Can anyone in their right mind please tell me that they don';t condone this from the shia side?...please somebody?

wow..

animals....

now I want the Shia to come and show some GUTTS and claim that 'Yazid' could have been more sick than the Shia's own "marjia' al-Khou'i or even Khamin'i the kisser of grown men or even Rafsanjani (whom I showed kissing a teenaged boy -title of my 'reported-then-removed' journal still showing in my main profile page, but I'll post the pic up again on my blog), or Khomeini's fatwa of doing mut'ah with the breat-fed baby!!!! And that's of course if they can prove from authentic sources that Yazid was as corrupt as they claim!!!

Now I think if he used to have monkeys or whatever..that's much less 'disgraceful' than a turbaned, supposedly 'pious' "shaikh" encourging 'same-sex touching' and kissing!!!!!!!!!!

in that case, I don't knwo what the "Shia of Ahlul-Bayt" differed with from the "Umayyids" their enemies, if both are morally corrupt (that is regardless of the shaky basis of the Shia allegations against the Umayyids, of course :)

ah, where is Asif_Ali's philosophical 'rebuttals' when the Shia most need them??? Aliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii (no, I'm not invoking ur "Ali ibn Abu-Talib", I mean the chicken naseeber Asif_Ali :)

WHO WANTS TO BE SHIA??? A SHIA PROUD OF HIS OWN SCHOLARS AND GUARDIANS OF HIS REVOLUTION?????????

a. moron
b. idiot
c. majnoon