israelis are experts in provocations. even if it were a "peaceful march", it's goal is provocation of palestinians who are there. Sharon's visit to Al Aqsa in 2000 was claimed to be peaceful... it was just a visit. but it has many implication on top of which control over land.... i live in palestine and have gone through many experiences when settlers, or israelis claimed to be peaceful but actually their existance ina certain place aims at provocation of violence. may be palestinians should react in a different manner...but this is how people usually respond to their occupiers and oppressors.

I believe the definition of terrorism varies from country to country. What the settlers did is defined as terrorism in most of the middle-East. Therefore, the action taken by these settlers is classed as terrorism in the article.

In the US, and most of Europe, this would not be classed as terrorism because violence was not involved...only intimidation.

Hmmmm...I in no way shape or form condone what the Jewish Settlers did, but ......did anybody actually READ the article? It was a peaceful protest with no actual acts of violence. Okay, so they blocked the entrance to the mosque. Is that truly terrorism?

i havent heard it.. but i amnot surprised . May Allah keep Masjid ul Aqsa standing.. as God forbid if yhey are successful in knocking down that mosque.. we sure will know that the trials and tribulations of th eAnti Christ will begin. I dont want to live to see that day