MBAs get no respect
Is it just me or has anyone noticed the lack of respect MBAs get when compared to MDs or JDs? Personally, I think MBAs have the most significant impact on society as they help drive the economy the most. MBAs are the ones that are creating jobs for everyone else so they can put food on the table. MDs and JDs are definitely important, but their impact is more personal while MBAs have a broader and, hence, even greater impact. Any thoughts? agree/disagree



Comments on this journal
That said, the point comes down to "which degree can be used to enhance our community most?" Do we need muslim MBAs to bring business, employment, etc into developing muslim regions? Do we need lawyers to structure transactions for these muslim businesspersons and to fight for minorities' benefits? Do we need doctors to help build medical infrastructure in the oh-so-many muslim regions that lack adequate medical care and supplies? We need it all. No degree is better than another. In fact, they're all bad because they provide an incentive to "make money and forget about everything else." Now the question is, what are we going to do in this world with these silly degrees--will we use them for allah's plans or will we stick them on a wall for our ego's pleasure?
1. Its not hard to get MBA as there too many schools offering MBA programs, where as MD or JD schools are limited in number and not easy to get in.
2. The work needed to do MBA is much less then work needed to do MD or JD. I can say that from my experience as I have degree in pharmacy and the level of work required for MBA was nothing compared to pharmacy.
3. MBA is not regulated by any governing body where as MDs and JDs are. They are required to obtain license and maintain their licenses.
Seems everyone is making good/interesting points. Aasmaan, I agree with many of the points you made but I don't see how they relate to our argument regarding MBA respect. I understand that thought and logic are required for practicing law, but again I reiterate that fact that this doesn't necessarily preclude people from learning it, as say difficult concepts in physics,etc. Again I say this because one of my earlier points was that difficulty of a program has little to do with the amount of respect an individual will get as a result. Although I admit a smarter individual might make a better lawyer, I still maintain that given eternity many would not comprehend Einstein's little book on special relativity.
Yaar, thanx for providing your perspective as it seems you have lots of relevant experience. I will point out something that I think is backed up by your writing. I think a top tier mba is not necessarily a guarantee of success, but it seems to be a good guaranteee of opportunity. it seems like you yourself have hired top tier MBA's and I really think that is the value of the degree more than the actual knowledge. Although i'm sure the quality of instruction at hbs is better than joe schmo u, I'm sure the level of education is not that disparate. The strength of the hbs mba in getting you an interview or opportunity vs. poor joe schmo is where the strength lies in my opinion.
peace out,
Rami
The reason that you are still a lawyer, even from a 3rd tier school, is because you have to take the same bar as everyone else to pass. Daffy Duck School of Law grads stil have to pass the same Bar Exam that the Harvard grads have to pass. Because the criteria established to be licensed is constant, at the end of the day is does not matter because your credibility as a lawyer is established by virtue of passing. The same goes for MD's and their Board exams..no matter where you went, the criteria to be considered and 'expert' is the same across the board - so no matter how dumb or smart of a JD or MD you might be, the law will not let you practice without your licence.
On the flip side, MBA's are held to no standard. Thus, the only 'standard' is the crediblity that comes with the respect of your school's name. If there was an MBA board exam that was required in order to practice, the top 20 would likely not matter at the end of the day.
Finally, I can only discern what 'uncertainty principle' means from the actual english of the word - but i would guess it is exactly what it means. The law is a completely uncertain feild in that, even with codefied law' it is the better argument that wins. there is no certainty to it at all and that is why is taught using the socratic method - you have to 'discern' the law and everyone discerns it differently. I do think that medicine is the 'dumbest' professional licensure on the planet. For the most part, the practice of medicine is a technical skill which requires no thinking outside of recalling memorized concepts and applying them to human beings. If evolution happened at a yearly rate, maybe Doctors would have to use their brains as tools for logic. Outside of the fact that I have no idea how to operate on myslef etc., I don'tthink doctors need much brain power to function. really no different than a carpenter. Oddly, I think veternarian doctors have more skill and brains tha human doctors do...
About saying one is easer and one is hard.. it is all relative. Some find bio hard and then some find Electro-mag theory nightmare.. JD has its own spices..
About culturally.. yeah JD and MD do make money but u only make decent money if u r good.. and same goes for MBA.. if it is from good school.. with good experince.. u will be printing money..
I think to figure out why the MD's and JD's get more respect in our cultures you simply have to look back at your country of origin and see what little weight an MBA has had there in the past as opposed to an MD or JD. MD and JD's have been associated with social standing and are respected proffesions where as the MBA and business careers are just coming into their own now in these parts of the world.
As for you Aasmann, I can see you really want your opinion heard having repeated it twice =) I think the problem with your argument is that you're comparing the relative ease of the programs rather than the weight of the degree. I never said an MBA was more difficult in its curriculum. But in terms of societal standing I'd give as much weight to an MBA from a top school as I do to a JD or MD. The reason being and it's something it seems everyone fails to realize, that it's more difficult to get into a top MBA program than it is to get into an average JD, maybe about the same as getting into any MD. At the end of the day if you go to joe schmo university and you get a law degree you're still a lawyer but if you go to joe schmo university and get an MBA you're out of luck.
As for arguing the difficulty of engineering vs. law vs. medicine, I just used engineering to represent a field of study in which conceptual understanding was critical. We could've used quantam physics for all I care. I have neither studied law nor medicine but have taken basic courses relating to each and have friends who've studied both and unless I'm missing something I don't think either relies heavily on understanding difficult concepts like the uncertainty principle for example. That's my opinion for what it's worth.
For the record though, I can't agree with you on the point about engineering being the most difficult to achieve. As I stated before, I believe it's all relative. My intent was not to bash other degree programs in order to put MBAs in a better light. Rather, I was just wondering why us MBAs don't get the same love. Peace.
...uh.. yeah, no.
md's? - ok tangible
jd's? completely intangible, just like engineering concepts...
to your point then, i would think business drivers are not business leaders but instead it is the innovators who create the products that represent or create the need. which leads us back to mostly scientists...of course business folks get it all up and running but w/o innovation there would be nothing.......classic chicken or egg..