Multidimensional Reference Axes (True 4D Space)
The following is an excerpt from the latest JE (#15) of Buzzaz titled: The Second Consecutive Ramadan with a Lunar Eclipse.
The book "Nothing in this Book is True, but it is Exactly How Things Are" by Frissell www.amazon.com) also discusses this knowledge.. but from a more historical and, refreshingly, skeptical perspective. Breathing exercises for merkabah-energy activation and the true origin of the actual multimensional Star of David are also explained. The Flower of Life, (which is essentially a basic construct of Buckminister Fuller's 4-dimensional reference-axis system based on nature,) is also dissected in a most elementary way.
I am a student of all things that point to Allah, which - essentially and by natural extension - means all things. Thus I take seriously the teachings of great teaches who enable me to stand on the towers of their erudition to see higher and reach further than I would otherwise have done. Thus I agree that studying ourselves, or the nature we are created in, is the most basic teaching for one who honestly chooses to learn. I term that as "trying to find my own way to Allah without the diversions that society and culture creates within religion." Thus I would like to bring us back to Bucky Fuller and his observations of how nature arranges itself, from a beehive to the efficient-packing stack of caviar. Think of Caviar as fluffy marbles, with a hard core and soft outer edges, so that a glass filled with them will automatically arrange themselves in the most efficient shape possible - whence comes the Axis of Nature. A great reference is available at this www.explorepub.com
We are shown how the mathematics of today deceives us by suggesting that we inhabit 3-dimensional space. "Putting us in a box", so to speak, which doesn't even occur in nature. Well, come outside of it, and see how the TRUE box is a tetrahedron (maximum efficiency, as in nature, e.g., the structure of a virus or how grandma wraps those samosa's.)
If we draw the shape of a tetrahedron, or better yet, picture one and then identify the center point in the middle, the lines going from it (the Origin) towards the pointed ends would form the 4 axes. This is easier to see in a dual-tetrahedron, a 2-D image of which has been relegated to the lable "The Star of David" as well as the flag of the only Jewish nation on this planet. In a (sic) 3-D Star of David, the axes are the straight lines joining opposite corners, and the origin point of the two inverted tetrahedrons is common.
Let us now work with the axis-system. If we look at the Origin point from directly above, the 4th axis is hidden from our view because it is pointing straight at us, through us, from (1, 0, 0, 0) to (0, 0, 0, 0). So this line gets taken out and we miss it - _UNLESS_ we change our point of view. This is the trick Modern Mathematics plays with us, when the same Origin point is depicted on paper, with three lines showing, because the 4th is pointing straight at our "I". You can read that as "eye" if you don't realize that "I" is the conscious-essence of YOU: which, in the final analysis, is the only thing that matters.
The remaining three axes look like they have 90 degree angles between them, and we are made to think that a 4th perpendicular axis isn't possible. Of course it isn't! That's not how nature has designed it. Stack 4 marbles in a 4-sided triangle, and then connect their cores to the empty center point between all the marbles. You've got the 4-dimensional axis system, and the empty point at the center of the tetrahedron is the true point of origin. Nature uses it along the lines of the Radial Co-ordinate system.
All the angles between the axes reveal themselves to be 120 degrees, not the sputrid 90 you and I were taught in school! How unnatural that would be! Does nature give us any example of 90 degree construction? I might have to continue this line of reasoning below (or start a new JE) just to explain this crucial piece of mind-liberating info. This book is a totally worthy read for anyone interested in questions that aren't readily answerable in 'conventional' circles.
The book "Nothing in this Book is True, but it is Exactly How Things Are" by Frissell www.amazon.com) also discusses this knowledge.. but from a more historical and, refreshingly, skeptical perspective. Breathing exercises for merkabah-energy activation and the true origin of the actual multimensional Star of David are also explained. The Flower of Life, (which is essentially a basic construct of Buckminister Fuller's 4-dimensional reference-axis system based on nature,) is also dissected in a most elementary way.
I am a student of all things that point to Allah, which - essentially and by natural extension - means all things. Thus I take seriously the teachings of great teaches who enable me to stand on the towers of their erudition to see higher and reach further than I would otherwise have done. Thus I agree that studying ourselves, or the nature we are created in, is the most basic teaching for one who honestly chooses to learn. I term that as "trying to find my own way to Allah without the diversions that society and culture creates within religion." Thus I would like to bring us back to Bucky Fuller and his observations of how nature arranges itself, from a beehive to the efficient-packing stack of caviar. Think of Caviar as fluffy marbles, with a hard core and soft outer edges, so that a glass filled with them will automatically arrange themselves in the most efficient shape possible - whence comes the Axis of Nature. A great reference is available at this www.explorepub.com
We are shown how the mathematics of today deceives us by suggesting that we inhabit 3-dimensional space. "Putting us in a box", so to speak, which doesn't even occur in nature. Well, come outside of it, and see how the TRUE box is a tetrahedron (maximum efficiency, as in nature, e.g., the structure of a virus or how grandma wraps those samosa's.)
If we draw the shape of a tetrahedron, or better yet, picture one and then identify the center point in the middle, the lines going from it (the Origin) towards the pointed ends would form the 4 axes. This is easier to see in a dual-tetrahedron, a 2-D image of which has been relegated to the lable "The Star of David" as well as the flag of the only Jewish nation on this planet. In a (sic) 3-D Star of David, the axes are the straight lines joining opposite corners, and the origin point of the two inverted tetrahedrons is common.
Let us now work with the axis-system. If we look at the Origin point from directly above, the 4th axis is hidden from our view because it is pointing straight at us, through us, from (1, 0, 0, 0) to (0, 0, 0, 0). So this line gets taken out and we miss it - _UNLESS_ we change our point of view. This is the trick Modern Mathematics plays with us, when the same Origin point is depicted on paper, with three lines showing, because the 4th is pointing straight at our "I". You can read that as "eye" if you don't realize that "I" is the conscious-essence of YOU: which, in the final analysis, is the only thing that matters.
The remaining three axes look like they have 90 degree angles between them, and we are made to think that a 4th perpendicular axis isn't possible. Of course it isn't! That's not how nature has designed it. Stack 4 marbles in a 4-sided triangle, and then connect their cores to the empty center point between all the marbles. You've got the 4-dimensional axis system, and the empty point at the center of the tetrahedron is the true point of origin. Nature uses it along the lines of the Radial Co-ordinate system.
All the angles between the axes reveal themselves to be 120 degrees, not the sputrid 90 you and I were taught in school! How unnatural that would be! Does nature give us any example of 90 degree construction? I might have to continue this line of reasoning below (or start a new JE) just to explain this crucial piece of mind-liberating info. This book is a totally worthy read for anyone interested in questions that aren't readily answerable in 'conventional' circles.



Comments on this journal
You say that we need more observable space to be able to preceive higher dimensions, yet this section of Buzzaz's JE above demonstrates how you're actually living in 4D space, and not the rudimentary (limited) 3D space that existing matHAmatics is trying to tell you. If you're actually in 4D space, thinking that you're in 3D space, couldn't it be possible that you _do_ exist in 11-dimensional space, yet are only capable of preceiving 4? (Not counting time as a directional variable.)
If you read the actual JE of Buzzaz, you'll see other things, references to other books, which actually explain the multidimensional nature of our soules. Our true selves are immortal, universal beings. That's what the Ruh (True Soul) is. So we know that this life is a dream, and that we're going to wake up from it. But what does that knowledge do to prepare us to look beyond the fetters, nay, the limitations, that this life puts on our perception of the real world around us?
To get to the answer to this question, you'll have to read my second-to-last JE. It is a little lengthy (Titled "What Makes Me Superman - Part II") but answers this question from at least another dimensional aspect. And then some..
Care to read it first, before we continue our conversation? Nonetheless, it is a pleasure coming across your intellect, and I hope, be'izn Allah, to converse with you more.
I hope you realize the co-relation to this shape to nature and its method of construction: both cellular as well as crystalline, or microscopic. If you consider this tetrahedron above the flat surface where you have built it, you can see that you can also add a 5th marble/ball to it, on any one side. And that makes it a 6 sided tetrahedron: a hexahedron? (Two Tetrahedrons conjoined at one side.) This is the basic building block of nature, if rocks, of viruses, and even of the bone structure of our bodies, to a certain extent. Nature is always teaching Mathematics. Its up to us to learn it.