Nash MVP? No Thanks...
according to the espn report at the following
sports.espn.go.com
nash will be named mvp tomorrow. im sorry, but i dispute....my pick would have either been iverson or s. o'neal . iverson did a lot more with a lot less than what nash had to work with.
sports.espn.go.com
nash will be named mvp tomorrow. im sorry, but i dispute....my pick would have either been iverson or s. o'neal . iverson did a lot more with a lot less than what nash had to work with.



Comments on this journal
Getting rid of Walker - improvement for mavs
losing Jamison - neg
Dirk stepping up and being able to take more shots - plus
losing Nash= huge neg, just watch how much trouble just setting up their offense...
Gaining Terry - plus
Gaining Stack and Harris - plus
Gaining Damp = plus...finally, an interior defender
Look at the improvement in stoudemire's stats...are you telling me that a guy goes up to shooting 56% without nash...or that career 40% guys like johnson/richardson become ridiculous long range gunners? Nash is piss poor defensively, but the way the guy pushes the ball and sets up teammates, you end up wearing out just trying to keep up offensively...plus look at the increased interest in the suns...Those that state that stoudemire's improvement is the main reason overlook that the heat went from having wade as a rookie, playing point guard for the first time (he was a wing in college) to playing in his 2nd year...Same with haslem, who is an underappreciated, but vital guy (a pf that will rebound/defend/not demand the ball). Also, shaq was out for several games this season but miami did okay, especially with mourning stepping up. When nash was gone, the suns doubled their losses (3-4 game losing streak).