Openness vs. shamelessness
General view is that openness and smooth flow of information are good. But then people may not need to know all the information.
Islamic teachings suggest that if you know about someone sinning you can take measures to stop such behavior but do not propagate a sin. However, hiding wrongs if done to an extreme could lead to a rotten society.
A totally opposite view that we see in developed societies is where people's personal life (especially celebrities' life) is not safe from outside intrusion. If someone does something wrong, people make sure it is publicized widely. And then there are shows like Jerry Springer where people expose their own dirty laundry.
So, where do you think the two points of view reconcile? How much information is too much? Any thoughts? Ideas? Opinions?
Islamic teachings suggest that if you know about someone sinning you can take measures to stop such behavior but do not propagate a sin. However, hiding wrongs if done to an extreme could lead to a rotten society.
A totally opposite view that we see in developed societies is where people's personal life (especially celebrities' life) is not safe from outside intrusion. If someone does something wrong, people make sure it is publicized widely. And then there are shows like Jerry Springer where people expose their own dirty laundry.
So, where do you think the two points of view reconcile? How much information is too much? Any thoughts? Ideas? Opinions?



Comments on this journal