questioning Hadith
Have people read Shakir's article "Another nail in the coffin of Hadith" on Naseeb Vibes? If not, it's at www3.naseeb.com
The issue of Hadith is an interesting one which I've been meaning to write about for years but never got around to. Firstly there's the fact that the majority of modern scholarship is very critical about the traditional "science" of determining Hadith authenticity through chain of transmission (isnad) evaluation. Questioning Hadith is also a good strategy for reform, as the Qur'an is in many ways much more open to fresh interpretation in a modern context than the Hadith.
Unfortunately, the Hadith literature is big and complex enough that it practically requires a PhD dissertation to treat it properly. Oh well, maybe someday =)
The issue of Hadith is an interesting one which I've been meaning to write about for years but never got around to. Firstly there's the fact that the majority of modern scholarship is very critical about the traditional "science" of determining Hadith authenticity through chain of transmission (isnad) evaluation. Questioning Hadith is also a good strategy for reform, as the Qur'an is in many ways much more open to fresh interpretation in a modern context than the Hadith.
Unfortunately, the Hadith literature is big and complex enough that it practically requires a PhD dissertation to treat it properly. Oh well, maybe someday =)



Comments on this journal
1. Mansukh (superceded) verses of the Quran lay a precedent for the supercedation of hadith (if one accepts hadith as a source of law in the first place)
2. Hadith literature is being made into a PhD issue so that most people get dissuaded and leave it to "experts"