Starting Salaries
Many MBA schools flaunt their grads starting salaries and signing bonuses in bid to attract students. I find that sometimes the figures can be a little misleading.
I'd be interested in knowing what are the experiences of fellow naseebers and their classfellows...based on geographical area and graduating school. Whats the difference b/w Ivy league, first tier and second tier?
In TO for example i would say that you can get something like 60-90K with the median range about 75.
Comments pls?
I'd be interested in knowing what are the experiences of fellow naseebers and their classfellows...based on geographical area and graduating school. Whats the difference b/w Ivy league, first tier and second tier?
In TO for example i would say that you can get something like 60-90K with the median range about 75.
Comments pls?



Comments on this journal
I believe salaries are ultimately determined by the average pay for the position applied for and the amount of experience the individual has in delivery.
Not sure if this is the thrust of your question, but I would not advise choosing an MBA program based on the starting compensation of fresh graduates. This can be misleading as it is largely a reflection of industries chosen. For example, I wouldn't be surprised if NYU and Columbia had higher starting salaries than Harvard, simply because more NYU and Columbia folks go into investment banking and asset management.
There are many other factors to consider when looking at B-schools, which I would urge you to weigh more heavily than starting salary.
I have always been in Human Resources (since graduating from undergrad) so when I got my MBA last year (by going to school part-time) I was not only enhancing my career path and salary capacity but knowledge as well. You have to go for the higher degree if your heart and soul are totally into it, else you won't be happy and won't care to excel at work due to lack of motivation. My MBA is not from an Ivy League but simply from a private school that was accessible from work so I could get to it fairly easily after work and then back home.
I don't have any experience with online programs but I would probably not value them as highly. If you're actually getting off your butt, going to classes on campus, and participating live in discussions/presentations, etc., well in my book, that shows alot more motivation and initiative than simply logging onto a PC. I don't know, this is just my opinion.
I had received a 25% increase in pay after getting an MBA and am now mash'allah in a highly visible position working for a pharmaceutical company. There is plenty of growth, scope, and career pathing in this industry so, knock on wood, I must say my MBA came in pretty handy. I am fairly new at this current job (as HR Manager) and judging from the fact that I was 1 of 74 candidates considered for the position and was the one who ended up with an offer, I don't think that was too bad. Pharmaceutcal industry is ideal to be in from many perspectives I think...opportunities, growth-horizon, compensation, benefits, etc.
In my HR capacity, I hire all grads. BS/BA is fine but at my company, we're big on PharmD, PhD, and MBA degrees. The first thing I look for is a COMBINATION of experience and degree, not just one or the other. I like hiring well-rounded individuals who are motivated to succeed work-wise and education-wise. It is so important to have that balance.