you know, the game, seems to define morality as a solely personal issue. rather than ever acually involving more than just the actor (s). its a limited definition of morality. but maybe they where just trying to get at a personal morality rather than a larger social obligation type morality. i daresay my morality quotent would be higher than normal if it was taken as a sociatal thing, rather than just a single persons desires/actions. and i guess Mystie, you're right. i am ok with heathonism of others. (although i was disturbed by the chiken humper/eater)

Yes, it does.

(ok, I just wanted to say that to someone) bwaha!

I think it's not so much about psychosis, but more one of personal morality v what should be legislated/acted against. Different viewpoint is all.

does that mean i am a psycho?

Taboo has been played 32814 times.

Your Moralising Quotient of 0.37 compares to an average Moralising Quotient of 0.25. This means that as far as the events depicted in the scenarios featured in this activity are concerned you are less permissive than average.

Your Interference Factor of 0.40 compares to an average Interference Factor of 0.15. This means that as far as the events depicted in the scenarios featured in this activity are concerned you are more likely to recommend societal interference in matters of moral wrongdoing, in the form of prevention or punishment, than average.

Your Universalising Factor of 0.33 compares to an average Universalising Factor of 0.43. This means you are less likely than average to see moral wrongdoing in universal terms - that is, without regard to prevailing cultural norms and social conventions (at least as far as the events depicted in the scenarios featured in this activity are concerned).

Are you thinking straight about morality?
/////////////////////////////////// ///////////////////
Although you do not evaluate the actions depicted in these scenarios to be across the board wrong, it is not entirely clear why you think that anything in them is morally problematic. You don't think an act can be morally wrong if it is entirely private and no one, not even the person doing the act, is harmed by it. The actions described in these scenarios are private like this and it was specified as clearly as possible that they didn't involve harm. Indeed, when asked about each scenario, in no instance did you respond that harm had resulted. Consequently, it is a real puzzle why you think that any of the actions depicted here are questionable morally speaking.

here are my results Results

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.37.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.40.

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.33

plato - you aren't a heathen, but u seem ok with others headonism ;-)

I ended up squarely on a personal morality arena.

There's a TON of other things like that here. I have a form fetish, so I'm just having a ball, especially with the morality ones:
www.philosophersnet.com

How did you do compared to other people?

Taboo has been played 32768 times.

Your Moralising Quotient of 0.13 compares to an average Moralising Quotient of 0.27. This means that as far as the events depicted in the scenarios featured in this activity are concerned you are more permissive than average.

Your Interference Factor of 0.00 compares to an average Interference Factor of 0.17. This means that as far as the events depicted in the scenarios featured in this activity are concerned you are less likely to recommend societal interference in matters of moral wrongdoing, in the form of prevention or punishment, than average.

Your Universalising Factor of 0.00 compares to an average Universalising Factor of 0.48. This means you are less likely than average to see moral wrongdoing in universal terms - that is, without regard to prevailing cultural norms and social conventions (at least as far as the events depicted in the scenarios featured in this activity are concerned).
*********************************** ******************************

wait a second... Am i a heathen?

thanks scorpion

that was fun. I'm a libertarian! (but i knew that already)

Taboo - The Results
Results

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.13.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.00.