The Historical Event of FADAK
The Historical Event of Fadak
After his victory at Khayber the Holy Prophet (S) decided to destroy the remaining strongholds of the Jews and thus end the danger to Islam. He therefore turned his attention to the Jewish village of Fadak, which was a fertile territory 180 kilometers north of Madina.
He sent an envoy to the elders of Fadak. The chief of the village, preferred peace and surrender to fighting. In return for the protection of the Muslims, he agreed to give half of the produce of the region to the Holy Prophet (S).
According to the rules of Islam, the lands conquered through war and military power are the property of all the Muslims and their administration lies with the ruler of the Muslims. However, those lands that are submitted to the Muslims without war, as in the case of Fadak, belong to the Holy Prophet (S) and after him, to the Holy Imam (A) of the time. They have the right to distribute such properties as they see fit. This is evident from the following verse:
Whatever God has bestowed on His Prophet from the people of the towns is for God and the Prophet and his relatives and the orphans and the needy and the wayfarer, so that it may not circulate among the rich ones of you...
Surae Hashr, 59 : 7(Part)
The land of Fadak thus came into the possession of the Holy Prophet (S), and when the following verse was revealed,
And give the kinsman his due, and the needy and the wayfarer...
Surae Bani Israa'il, 17 : 26(Part)
he made a gift of Fadak to his dear daughter Bibi Fatima (A).
He did this for several reasons. Firstly, he was commanded to give his near ones their due. The Holy Prophet (S) and all the Muslims were indebted to Bibi Khadija (A) who sacrificed her entire wealth for the sake of the early Muslims. Her money had been used to spread Islam, free those Muslims who were slaves and support them in their times of trouble as in the three years of social boycott that they had faced in Makka. Now the Holy Prophet (S) could return her favours by gifting her daughter the rich land of Fadak. He also knew that after him, Imam Ali (A) would need Fadak as a source of income to safeguard his position as Caliph.
Finally, he wanted to leave some provision for his daughter and grandchildren so that they could live with dignity after his death.
However, after the Holy Prophet (S) passed away, Abu Bakr, who had stolen the right of Imam Ali (A) to the Caliphate, took Fadak away from Bibi Fatima (A). He did this to ensure that Imam Ali (A) would not have the means to regain his rights.
When her agents informed her that they had been replaced by the Caliph's men at Fadak, Bibi Fatima (A) decided to contest her right by legal means.
Abu Bakr refused to acknowledge her claim, and asked her to provide witnesses. Although she already possessed the property of Fadak and there had never been any doubt about her ownership, she brought two witnesses. These were Imam Ali (A) and a woman named Umme Ayman, about whom the Holy Prophet (S) had guaranteed that she would go to heaven.
Even then, Abu Bakr would not agree and he quoted a fake tradition saying,
"The Holy Prophet has said, `We the group of Prophets do not inherit, nor are we inherited and what we leave is for alms.'"
This was a blatant lie and moreover no one but Abu Bakr claimed to have heard it.
Bibi Fatima (A) then gave an eloquent lecture in which she first explained about the Oneness of Allah and the nature of the mission of her father. She then proved that Abu Bakr was lying by quoting the following verse:
And Sulaiman inherited Dawood...
Surae Naml 27 : 16(Part)
Although Abu Bakr was ashamed of his conduct and decided to return Fadak to her, she never forgave him for his actions. She did not speak to him again as long as she lived and at her funeral six months after her father died, he was not allowed to take part as per her will.
Eventually, Abu Bakr wrote a certificate to the effect that Fadak was the absolute property of Bibi Fatima (A) and gave it to her. However, when she was going back to her house, Umar al-Khattab chanced to meet her and came to know the contents of the certificate. He brought it back to Abu Bakr saying,
"As Ali is a beneficiary in this case, his evidence is not acceptable. As for Umme Ayman, being a woman, her testimony is also of no value on its own."
Saying this, he tore up the certificate in the presence of Abu Bakr. This action grieved Bibi Fatima (A) so much that she cursed him saying,
"May Allah cause your abdomen to be torn in the same way."
This prayer proved fateful, because in 24 A.H., Umar was stabbed thrice in the stomach by his killer, Abu Lulu.
After this, Fadak remained in the hands of successive rulers until the time of the Umayyad Caliph Umar bin Abdul Aziz, who returned it to Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A). However, the next Caliph took it away and it remained with the Bani Umayyah Caliphs until their rule ended. During the rule of the Bani Abbas it was returned briefly, but then taken away forever.
An Account of Fadak
1) On 7th Hijri, the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) had given this place as a gift to his beloved daughter Janabe Fatema (s.a.). She used to administer this place through her appointees.
2) Just ten days after the demise of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.), Fadak was snatched away from her. Inspite of providing proofs and witnesses, it was not returned to her. It was not considered as a parented heritage and property.
3) According to Sahih Bukhari the 2nd Caliph had returned it to the successors.
4) The 3rd Caliph took possession of it by force and gifted it to Marwan.
5) Mu'aviya in his time divided it into three parts.
6) Marwan, during the tenure of his Khilafat took all of it in his possession and gifted away to his sons Abdul Malik and Abdul Aziz. It remained in their possession till the time of Umar Bin Abdul Aziz.
7) Umar Bin Abdul Aziz, got his father's share as inheritance, he bought the share of Abdul Malik and returned it to the children of Fatema (s.a.).
8) Yazid Bin Malik, in his time, took it back from the children of Fatema (s.a.), and kept it in his possession.
9) The 1st Caliph of Bani Abbas, Sa'fah, considering Imam Hasan (a.s.) as a successor of Fatema (s.a.), gave Fadak to him.
10) Mansoor Dawaniqi, again usurped it.
11) Mahdi, the son of Mansoor returned it to the children of Hazrat Ali (a.s.).
12) Moosa, the son of Mahdi, again usurped it. Fadak that was given by the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) to Janabe Fatema Zahra (s.a.), was changing hands between the Caliphs of Bani Abbas, till the time of Ma'moun.
13) Ma'moun, had a religious discussion with a follower of Hazrat-Ali (a.s.) (Alawi), and reached to the decision that Fadak is the property of Janabe Fatema (s.a.). Hence he returned it to her children.
14) Mutwakkel Abbasi, usurped it and took it in his possession. He gifted it away to Abdulla Bin Umar Baaq. Abdulla Bin Umar Baaq, ordered Bushraan Bin Abi Umaryyi Taqzi to go and cut down all the trees. He went to Medina and cut all the trees. He even cut those eleven trees that were personally planted by the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.). When Bushraan returned from Medina to Basrah he was struck by paralysis and died subsequently.
If Fadak was not the property of Fatema Zahra (s.a.w.a.), then why the 2nd Caliph, Umar Bin Abdul Aziz, Sa'fah, Mahdi and Mamoon and other Umayyid Caliphs had returned it to Janabe Fatema (s.a.)?
If Fadak was the property of Fatema Zahra (s.a.w.a.) why the 3rd Caliph, Mu'aviya, Yazid Bin Abdul Malik, Mansoor Dawaniqi, Moosa Bin Mahdi and Mutewakkel added it in their property? And why they gifted it away to others? If Fadak, was the property of Government Treasury, every Muslim was having a right over it; why only a few favorites were considered for keeping it?
Why the 1st Caliph did not do justice by it? And he did not try to earn the pleasure of Janabe Fatema Zahra (s.a.), by giving it to her. This would have resulted in earning the pleasure of Allah as well as of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.).
The Historical Tragedy of Fadak
In addition to being a reason encouraging others to be unjust to Ahlul-Bayt, the usurping of Fadak by Abu Bakr ignited political unrest throughout history. Sheik Jafar Subhani, a leading historian, wrote the following in his book The Message P.60 1 regarding Fadak throughout history:
"The foundation of the deprivation of the descendants of Fatima s claim of Fadak was laid in the time of the First Callph. After the martyrdom of Ali, Mu awiyah assumed the reins of government and divided Fadak amongst three persons (Marwan, Amr bin Uthman and his own son, Yazid). During the preriod of the Caliphate of Marwan, all three shares were assumed by him and he gifted them to his son, AbdulAziz. He, in turn, gave the same to his son, Umar. On account of the fact that Umar Bin Abdul Aziz was an upright person from amongst Bani Umayyah, the first heresy which he removed was that he returned Fadak to the descendants of Fatima. After his death, however, the succeeding Umayyad Caliphs again took away Fadak from the Bani Hashim and it continued to remain in their possession till their rule came to an end.
During the Caliphate of Bani Abbas, the question of Fadak vacillated in a strange manner. For example, Saffah gave it to Abdullah Bin Hassan and after him Mansur Dawaniqi took it back but his son Mahdi returned it to the descendants of Zahrah. After him Musa and Harun took it a way from them on account of some political considerations. When Ma`mun assumed the office of caliph, he handed it over formally to its owner. After his death, the conditions of Fadak vacillated once again and it was returned at one time to the descendants of Fatima and then taken away from them again.
During the periods of the Caliphate of Bani Umayah and Bani Abbas, Fadak assumed largely a political aspect as compared with its pecuniaiy aspect. And even if the First Caliphs were in need of income from Fadak the later Caliphs and nobles were so rich that they did not stand in any need of income from it. Hence, when Umar Bin Abdul Aziz handed over Fadak to the descendants of Fatima, Bani Umayyah reproached him and said,' By this act of your, you have found fault with the two venerable men (viz. Abu Bakr and Umar).' They, therefore, persuaded him to distribute the income from Fadak among the descendants of Fatima, but to keep its ownership with himself."
Source - Fatima the Gracious, compiled by Abu Muhammad Ordoni (Jordanian).
Hadrat Fatema's house attacked
In compliance with God's command Baligh maa onzila ilaik-' (5:67) the Holy Prophet had inaugurated the serial of Imamate' (Divine guidance in succession to the Final apostleship) and had placed Au as the First in charge of it, and had declared it at the historic ceremonial event at Ghadeer-e-Khum, before the multitude of the thousands of the Hajies, on 8. 12.10 A.H. at the conclusion of which event was revealed 5:6... declaring the religion to be perfect and Islam to be the religion for man, accepted by God. In pursuance of the expressed divine will of the Lord, Au could not recognize or yield to the man-made authority set up at the Saqeefa' and hence had not paid fealty to it.
Imam Ali (A.S.) to exercise patience
The holy Prophet who knew through the divine gift of knowledge, as to what would happen after him till the Day of Judgment, had advised Ali to exercise the maximum possible patience against every atrocious move that might confront him. In compliance with the apostolic will, without the least interference into, or any concern with the affairs that proceeded at the Saqeefa', Ali had retired with a determination not to get out until he collects together all the notes on the Holy Qur'an which he had from the Holy Prophet about the external as well as the internal meanings of the Final Word of God.
Without Ali being subjugated, the authority set up at the Saqeefa' could not have the seal of the recognition of it, by the Holy Ahul-Bait and Ali was now the Chief of the Ahlul-Bait, the House of the Holy Prophet, and he would not yield. The retirement of Ali was exploited and a charge of conspiracy was coined and the people of the newly set up rule, headed by Omar, collected at the door of Fatema, demanded Au to come out of the house. The reply from inside was that it was a vow Au had made not to come out until the collection of the important notes on the Holy Qur'an is not completed. But the insurgent crowd would not agree and a big row was set into action.
Hadrat Fatema's house threatened with fire
The Holy Lady Fatema, bereaved only a day or two before, deeply sunk in grief; standing behind the door of her abode remonstrated saying:
"O' people! it is only yesterday that my father, the holy Prophet, departed from you and today you have the audacity to attack his house in which his daughter is mourning for him, which door he did not enter but with a salutation on its inmates".
Some historians say that fire and firewood was already- collected at the door of the holy house with the threat to set the abode on fire and some say fire was already kindled. However, Shibli No'mani in his well-known Alfarooq' says: - "Some say that fire was already set, but with the short temperedness of Omar this act was not improbable". (AF)
Hadrat Fatema wounded
A violent kick at the door from one among the crowd pushed it down on the side of the Holy Lady Fatema standing behind it, breaking her rib and the Khatoone Jannat' the Queen of Paradise, fell unconscious and ultimately the hit and the wound killed the Holy Mother along with the baby son in her womb. According to the tradition of the Ahlul-Bait, the Baby was already named Mohsin.
Hadrat Fatema martyred succumbing to the Wound
Thus after seventy-five or ninety days after the departure of the Holy Prophet, as prophesied, the Holy Lady passed away. But before breathing her last, she called Ali and desired that none of those particularly a few ones, who had turned hostile to the House of the Prophet and violated the will of the Apostle of God, should be informed of her departure from this world, and that she should be quietly buried in the darkness of the night.
Some reporters say that when the body was lowered into the grave, by Ali, in the grave appeared the two hands of the Holy Prophet, with a voice addressing Ali:- "Come on! Ali! Return thou the part of mine, to me". It is said that Ali shedding tears responded to the voice saying:-
"I am ashamed of thee O' Apostle of God,for I took Fatema from thee sound in her body but I am now returning her unto thee rib-broken".
Thus, the Holy Lady was the first of the martyrs among the Ahlul-Bait, after the departure of the Holy Prophet.
It is now left to the intelligent ones of the readers to judge the position of those who annoyed this holy one of God, (i.e., Lady Fatema) under the apostolic announcements of the Holy Prophet and the verse of the Holy Qur'an referred to above.
It is authentically reported that the Holy Lady once referring to her miserable plight and the sorrowful life she had to lead, addressing her father, the Holy Prophet, standing before his grave, said :- "Oh! Father dear! After thee, fell on me such miseries that had they fallen on bright days, the bright days would have turned into darkest nights.
The Holy Lady of Light left behind two sons and two daughters whose ages at the time of her departing from them, were :-
Hasan about 8 years.
Husain about 7 years.
Zainab (daughter) about 6 years.
Umme Kulthoom (daughter) about 5 years.
After his victory at Khayber the Holy Prophet (S) decided to destroy the remaining strongholds of the Jews and thus end the danger to Islam. He therefore turned his attention to the Jewish village of Fadak, which was a fertile territory 180 kilometers north of Madina.
He sent an envoy to the elders of Fadak. The chief of the village, preferred peace and surrender to fighting. In return for the protection of the Muslims, he agreed to give half of the produce of the region to the Holy Prophet (S).
According to the rules of Islam, the lands conquered through war and military power are the property of all the Muslims and their administration lies with the ruler of the Muslims. However, those lands that are submitted to the Muslims without war, as in the case of Fadak, belong to the Holy Prophet (S) and after him, to the Holy Imam (A) of the time. They have the right to distribute such properties as they see fit. This is evident from the following verse:
Whatever God has bestowed on His Prophet from the people of the towns is for God and the Prophet and his relatives and the orphans and the needy and the wayfarer, so that it may not circulate among the rich ones of you...
Surae Hashr, 59 : 7(Part)
The land of Fadak thus came into the possession of the Holy Prophet (S), and when the following verse was revealed,
And give the kinsman his due, and the needy and the wayfarer...
Surae Bani Israa'il, 17 : 26(Part)
he made a gift of Fadak to his dear daughter Bibi Fatima (A).
He did this for several reasons. Firstly, he was commanded to give his near ones their due. The Holy Prophet (S) and all the Muslims were indebted to Bibi Khadija (A) who sacrificed her entire wealth for the sake of the early Muslims. Her money had been used to spread Islam, free those Muslims who were slaves and support them in their times of trouble as in the three years of social boycott that they had faced in Makka. Now the Holy Prophet (S) could return her favours by gifting her daughter the rich land of Fadak. He also knew that after him, Imam Ali (A) would need Fadak as a source of income to safeguard his position as Caliph.
Finally, he wanted to leave some provision for his daughter and grandchildren so that they could live with dignity after his death.
However, after the Holy Prophet (S) passed away, Abu Bakr, who had stolen the right of Imam Ali (A) to the Caliphate, took Fadak away from Bibi Fatima (A). He did this to ensure that Imam Ali (A) would not have the means to regain his rights.
When her agents informed her that they had been replaced by the Caliph's men at Fadak, Bibi Fatima (A) decided to contest her right by legal means.
Abu Bakr refused to acknowledge her claim, and asked her to provide witnesses. Although she already possessed the property of Fadak and there had never been any doubt about her ownership, she brought two witnesses. These were Imam Ali (A) and a woman named Umme Ayman, about whom the Holy Prophet (S) had guaranteed that she would go to heaven.
Even then, Abu Bakr would not agree and he quoted a fake tradition saying,
"The Holy Prophet has said, `We the group of Prophets do not inherit, nor are we inherited and what we leave is for alms.'"
This was a blatant lie and moreover no one but Abu Bakr claimed to have heard it.
Bibi Fatima (A) then gave an eloquent lecture in which she first explained about the Oneness of Allah and the nature of the mission of her father. She then proved that Abu Bakr was lying by quoting the following verse:
And Sulaiman inherited Dawood...
Surae Naml 27 : 16(Part)
Although Abu Bakr was ashamed of his conduct and decided to return Fadak to her, she never forgave him for his actions. She did not speak to him again as long as she lived and at her funeral six months after her father died, he was not allowed to take part as per her will.
Eventually, Abu Bakr wrote a certificate to the effect that Fadak was the absolute property of Bibi Fatima (A) and gave it to her. However, when she was going back to her house, Umar al-Khattab chanced to meet her and came to know the contents of the certificate. He brought it back to Abu Bakr saying,
"As Ali is a beneficiary in this case, his evidence is not acceptable. As for Umme Ayman, being a woman, her testimony is also of no value on its own."
Saying this, he tore up the certificate in the presence of Abu Bakr. This action grieved Bibi Fatima (A) so much that she cursed him saying,
"May Allah cause your abdomen to be torn in the same way."
This prayer proved fateful, because in 24 A.H., Umar was stabbed thrice in the stomach by his killer, Abu Lulu.
After this, Fadak remained in the hands of successive rulers until the time of the Umayyad Caliph Umar bin Abdul Aziz, who returned it to Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A). However, the next Caliph took it away and it remained with the Bani Umayyah Caliphs until their rule ended. During the rule of the Bani Abbas it was returned briefly, but then taken away forever.
An Account of Fadak
1) On 7th Hijri, the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) had given this place as a gift to his beloved daughter Janabe Fatema (s.a.). She used to administer this place through her appointees.
2) Just ten days after the demise of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.), Fadak was snatched away from her. Inspite of providing proofs and witnesses, it was not returned to her. It was not considered as a parented heritage and property.
3) According to Sahih Bukhari the 2nd Caliph had returned it to the successors.
4) The 3rd Caliph took possession of it by force and gifted it to Marwan.
5) Mu'aviya in his time divided it into three parts.
6) Marwan, during the tenure of his Khilafat took all of it in his possession and gifted away to his sons Abdul Malik and Abdul Aziz. It remained in their possession till the time of Umar Bin Abdul Aziz.
7) Umar Bin Abdul Aziz, got his father's share as inheritance, he bought the share of Abdul Malik and returned it to the children of Fatema (s.a.).
8) Yazid Bin Malik, in his time, took it back from the children of Fatema (s.a.), and kept it in his possession.
9) The 1st Caliph of Bani Abbas, Sa'fah, considering Imam Hasan (a.s.) as a successor of Fatema (s.a.), gave Fadak to him.
10) Mansoor Dawaniqi, again usurped it.
11) Mahdi, the son of Mansoor returned it to the children of Hazrat Ali (a.s.).
12) Moosa, the son of Mahdi, again usurped it. Fadak that was given by the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) to Janabe Fatema Zahra (s.a.), was changing hands between the Caliphs of Bani Abbas, till the time of Ma'moun.
13) Ma'moun, had a religious discussion with a follower of Hazrat-Ali (a.s.) (Alawi), and reached to the decision that Fadak is the property of Janabe Fatema (s.a.). Hence he returned it to her children.
14) Mutwakkel Abbasi, usurped it and took it in his possession. He gifted it away to Abdulla Bin Umar Baaq. Abdulla Bin Umar Baaq, ordered Bushraan Bin Abi Umaryyi Taqzi to go and cut down all the trees. He went to Medina and cut all the trees. He even cut those eleven trees that were personally planted by the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.). When Bushraan returned from Medina to Basrah he was struck by paralysis and died subsequently.
If Fadak was not the property of Fatema Zahra (s.a.w.a.), then why the 2nd Caliph, Umar Bin Abdul Aziz, Sa'fah, Mahdi and Mamoon and other Umayyid Caliphs had returned it to Janabe Fatema (s.a.)?
If Fadak was the property of Fatema Zahra (s.a.w.a.) why the 3rd Caliph, Mu'aviya, Yazid Bin Abdul Malik, Mansoor Dawaniqi, Moosa Bin Mahdi and Mutewakkel added it in their property? And why they gifted it away to others? If Fadak, was the property of Government Treasury, every Muslim was having a right over it; why only a few favorites were considered for keeping it?
Why the 1st Caliph did not do justice by it? And he did not try to earn the pleasure of Janabe Fatema Zahra (s.a.), by giving it to her. This would have resulted in earning the pleasure of Allah as well as of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.).
The Historical Tragedy of Fadak
In addition to being a reason encouraging others to be unjust to Ahlul-Bayt, the usurping of Fadak by Abu Bakr ignited political unrest throughout history. Sheik Jafar Subhani, a leading historian, wrote the following in his book The Message P.60 1 regarding Fadak throughout history:
"The foundation of the deprivation of the descendants of Fatima s claim of Fadak was laid in the time of the First Callph. After the martyrdom of Ali, Mu awiyah assumed the reins of government and divided Fadak amongst three persons (Marwan, Amr bin Uthman and his own son, Yazid). During the preriod of the Caliphate of Marwan, all three shares were assumed by him and he gifted them to his son, AbdulAziz. He, in turn, gave the same to his son, Umar. On account of the fact that Umar Bin Abdul Aziz was an upright person from amongst Bani Umayyah, the first heresy which he removed was that he returned Fadak to the descendants of Fatima. After his death, however, the succeeding Umayyad Caliphs again took away Fadak from the Bani Hashim and it continued to remain in their possession till their rule came to an end.
During the Caliphate of Bani Abbas, the question of Fadak vacillated in a strange manner. For example, Saffah gave it to Abdullah Bin Hassan and after him Mansur Dawaniqi took it back but his son Mahdi returned it to the descendants of Zahrah. After him Musa and Harun took it a way from them on account of some political considerations. When Ma`mun assumed the office of caliph, he handed it over formally to its owner. After his death, the conditions of Fadak vacillated once again and it was returned at one time to the descendants of Fatima and then taken away from them again.
During the periods of the Caliphate of Bani Umayah and Bani Abbas, Fadak assumed largely a political aspect as compared with its pecuniaiy aspect. And even if the First Caliphs were in need of income from Fadak the later Caliphs and nobles were so rich that they did not stand in any need of income from it. Hence, when Umar Bin Abdul Aziz handed over Fadak to the descendants of Fatima, Bani Umayyah reproached him and said,' By this act of your, you have found fault with the two venerable men (viz. Abu Bakr and Umar).' They, therefore, persuaded him to distribute the income from Fadak among the descendants of Fatima, but to keep its ownership with himself."
Source - Fatima the Gracious, compiled by Abu Muhammad Ordoni (Jordanian).
Hadrat Fatema's house attacked
In compliance with God's command Baligh maa onzila ilaik-' (5:67) the Holy Prophet had inaugurated the serial of Imamate' (Divine guidance in succession to the Final apostleship) and had placed Au as the First in charge of it, and had declared it at the historic ceremonial event at Ghadeer-e-Khum, before the multitude of the thousands of the Hajies, on 8. 12.10 A.H. at the conclusion of which event was revealed 5:6... declaring the religion to be perfect and Islam to be the religion for man, accepted by God. In pursuance of the expressed divine will of the Lord, Au could not recognize or yield to the man-made authority set up at the Saqeefa' and hence had not paid fealty to it.
Imam Ali (A.S.) to exercise patience
The holy Prophet who knew through the divine gift of knowledge, as to what would happen after him till the Day of Judgment, had advised Ali to exercise the maximum possible patience against every atrocious move that might confront him. In compliance with the apostolic will, without the least interference into, or any concern with the affairs that proceeded at the Saqeefa', Ali had retired with a determination not to get out until he collects together all the notes on the Holy Qur'an which he had from the Holy Prophet about the external as well as the internal meanings of the Final Word of God.
Without Ali being subjugated, the authority set up at the Saqeefa' could not have the seal of the recognition of it, by the Holy Ahul-Bait and Ali was now the Chief of the Ahlul-Bait, the House of the Holy Prophet, and he would not yield. The retirement of Ali was exploited and a charge of conspiracy was coined and the people of the newly set up rule, headed by Omar, collected at the door of Fatema, demanded Au to come out of the house. The reply from inside was that it was a vow Au had made not to come out until the collection of the important notes on the Holy Qur'an is not completed. But the insurgent crowd would not agree and a big row was set into action.
Hadrat Fatema's house threatened with fire
The Holy Lady Fatema, bereaved only a day or two before, deeply sunk in grief; standing behind the door of her abode remonstrated saying:
"O' people! it is only yesterday that my father, the holy Prophet, departed from you and today you have the audacity to attack his house in which his daughter is mourning for him, which door he did not enter but with a salutation on its inmates".
Some historians say that fire and firewood was already- collected at the door of the holy house with the threat to set the abode on fire and some say fire was already kindled. However, Shibli No'mani in his well-known Alfarooq' says: - "Some say that fire was already set, but with the short temperedness of Omar this act was not improbable". (AF)
Hadrat Fatema wounded
A violent kick at the door from one among the crowd pushed it down on the side of the Holy Lady Fatema standing behind it, breaking her rib and the Khatoone Jannat' the Queen of Paradise, fell unconscious and ultimately the hit and the wound killed the Holy Mother along with the baby son in her womb. According to the tradition of the Ahlul-Bait, the Baby was already named Mohsin.
Hadrat Fatema martyred succumbing to the Wound
Thus after seventy-five or ninety days after the departure of the Holy Prophet, as prophesied, the Holy Lady passed away. But before breathing her last, she called Ali and desired that none of those particularly a few ones, who had turned hostile to the House of the Prophet and violated the will of the Apostle of God, should be informed of her departure from this world, and that she should be quietly buried in the darkness of the night.
Some reporters say that when the body was lowered into the grave, by Ali, in the grave appeared the two hands of the Holy Prophet, with a voice addressing Ali:- "Come on! Ali! Return thou the part of mine, to me". It is said that Ali shedding tears responded to the voice saying:-
"I am ashamed of thee O' Apostle of God,for I took Fatema from thee sound in her body but I am now returning her unto thee rib-broken".
Thus, the Holy Lady was the first of the martyrs among the Ahlul-Bait, after the departure of the Holy Prophet.
It is now left to the intelligent ones of the readers to judge the position of those who annoyed this holy one of God, (i.e., Lady Fatema) under the apostolic announcements of the Holy Prophet and the verse of the Holy Qur'an referred to above.
It is authentically reported that the Holy Lady once referring to her miserable plight and the sorrowful life she had to lead, addressing her father, the Holy Prophet, standing before his grave, said :- "Oh! Father dear! After thee, fell on me such miseries that had they fallen on bright days, the bright days would have turned into darkest nights.
The Holy Lady of Light left behind two sons and two daughters whose ages at the time of her departing from them, were :-
Hasan about 8 years.
Husain about 7 years.
Zainab (daughter) about 6 years.
Umme Kulthoom (daughter) about 5 years.



Comments on this journal
You and your buddies have lived your lives interpreting the Qu'ran the way you want, going as far as saying Allah has a physical body and killing anyone who opposed your distorted views. Your Uncle Osama must be very proud.
So Slipperysword, ru waiting for the day when your great sheikhs have written Allah (swt) will stomp his foot in Hell (since according to you he has a body) to punish you and your buddies ?
Astagrfillah.............may Allah protect us from people who cause problems for Islam and the Muslim Umma such as the Evangelical Christians, Zionists, and last but not least the Salafis who are having a field day murdering innocent Shia3 and Muslims in I3raq and Pakistan and elsewhere in the Muslim world.
Lakum Deenakum Wa Liya Deen.
(You have your religion (distorted Salafism) and I have mine. (islam in the path of the Prophet (saw) and his ahlul bayt (3as))
Ameen.
And with that I have no energy, time or patience to respond to anymore of your lunatic entries so dont expect any more responses from me cause youre not worth it.
I have better things to do with my time.
But they won't be able to prove that he did, becausae the hadith he applied on Fatimah ..he also applied on Aysha!!!!
that's u always here, when u have nothing to say..either u start a new journal..or joke.
he laughs best who laughs last.
looooooooooooooooool
ok, assignment: prove Imamate from the Qur'an!!! looooooooool
or disprove the concept of Shurah in selecting the Muslim's ruler :)
trust me that I know all ur accusations against Islam, and I know the answers to them all, but I can't waste so much time on you, people. I've shown enough that I know where to strike you and that I know more than all of you about ur own religion.
Asif_Ali needs to respond to his fellow Shia about the major books of their religion which they don't even hear of, like 'Man La Yahdurhul Faqih' :) Asif, u don't know ur own books, how am I supposed to debate u??????? You'll use my books against me??? If u don't know ur own religion, will u know mine or understand it right??? :)
U Shia have to straighten ur story up, u know. One time u say the Umayyids falsified our history, hid narrations, (and those more knowledgable from among u would reveal the other accusation: that they omittied verses from the Quran against the Sahabah and in support of "Ahlul-bayt"),...but then...u claim to find soooo much against us in the Quran AND our own books!!!! :D loooool
wouldn't it naturally be deduced that..if the Umayyids (the triumphants) wrote history, they could have also omitted what u hold against us from our own books and stuff??? :( but why, OH WHY, are there narrations against us in our books?? :( i don't understand how that's possible!!! Awww, the Umayyids didn't finish their job, I guess :( they missed a few narrations!! Awww, now we're put to eternal shame by the few fools called Shia or what??? lol naaaaaaaah,..... let the shia know their own books and the jokes they really are...and then make sure they are sane enough to be able to read and comprehend our books :)
my god, i can't get over how such jokes u ppl r!!! how can u stand urself?? just...just for god's sake...look at ur own very label, "shia",...like...ewww, what the heck is that disgusting name???? lol how can u go around calling urself shit..oops, typo, i meant shitte, lol....
ah, love laughing at u, ppl! hate u to death and after death.
prove to me that u read us....so that we read u.....prove it by reading THEN ANSWERING this simple question:
5 years of Ali in power...y didn't he restore Fadak?? :)
KharaNaseeb jumps over to Abdelmalik the Umayyid and claims he restored Fadak! Ok, regardless of that, why DIDN'T ALI DO THAT????????????????????????
We have articles on this issue, but since you are all enjoying mut'ah in bed..I doubt that a mere historical event of "lost inheritence" will interest you! Steamy, hot mut'ah bed are more tempting than a mere 14-century old grievance of some women you men drowning in mut'ah never met and never will (i.e., Fatimah bint Muhammad).
Get lost with ur nonsense! Pffff, "follow Ahlul-Bayt"!! Follow them where? to dinner at a restaurant??? Nothing special about Ahlul-Bayt (a term we understand to include ALL THE PROPHET'S WIVES TOO, fools) nothing special about them but that which our (Sunni) Islam taught us.
Go worship them alone, we worship only Allah.
Keep avoiding the simple question, cowards!!! Keep hiding u Asif_Ali, keep hiding baby!!! Or come show us the god damn knowledge!!!! Come face SilkySword for once, idiot, without falsely accusing him of dishonest translation or incomplete citations!!! :)
Fool, fool fool fool, you think SILKYSWORD would risk his credibility, and in front of who, pieces of sh!t (i.e., Shiites)??? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
try again, kiddo!!! It's not SilkySword who exposes his credibility to any criticism, because SilkySword is after the Truth, aided and strong by the Truth, and you'll keep forever avoiding everything SilkySword raises here!!!
Never, and I say NEVER, did you answer SilkySword in his always-hurried comments and journals against you. I IMPLORE you...PROVE ME WRONG ONCE,....ONCE, FOR THE SAKE OF THE AHLUL-BAYT U REVERE SO MUCH, PAHLEEEEEZ, KIDS!!!!
OK, I'LL GIVE U AN IDEA!!!! ASK THE HUNDREDS OF SHIA IN UR STINKING MUT'AH VILLAGE TO JOIN A COMMITTEE TO ANSWER THE SIMPLE QUESTION RAISED HERE, OR EVERYTHING I HAVE IN MY SIMPLE BLOG!!! AND I'LL GIVE U 100 YRS TO COORDINATE THIS EFFORT!!!
Masoomeen, what happened with ur Alert in ur stinking village against me? :) Anyone rose up to help u budd?? looooooooool
tsk tsk tsk tsk, pathetic shiites :D u always will be humiliated and overcome :) u'll remain a negligible, dispecable minority of misguided deviant foolish clowns.
Let us analyze the statement that is attributed to Abu Bakr against the Qu'ran :
"And Solomon (Sulaymaan) inherited from David." (Quran 27:16)
While both Sulaymaan and David were prophets and very wealthy. They were
kings at their era. Allah , Exalted, also says:
"(Zakariya prayed to Allah by saying) ... Grant me a son from
yourself, who inherits from me and inherit from the children of Jacob,
and make him, O' my Lord, the one with whom you are well- pleased."
(Quran: 19:5-6).
These are examples that Prophets left inheritances, and as might you have
seen that they seem to contradict the hadith that attributed to Abu Bakr.
The tradition mentioned by Abu Bakr is fabricated otherwise it would not
contradict the Holy Quran.
The Prophet in his life time with the instructions from Allah the almighty
presented this Land to Seyyida Zahra(3AS), as is found in the Commentary
of the respected Sunni Scholar, Jalaluddin al-Suyuti. Here is the
historical background for the Land of Fadak, and after that is the text for
the Tafseer for the Verse 26 Chapter XVII.
Imam Ali (AS) was sent to Fadak, a Jewish town not far from Khaibar to
take it. But, before the use of any force, the inhabitants tendered their
submission, ceding half of their property to the prophet. When the Angel
Gabriel revealed to the Prophet the Divine Command as in the Verse 26 of
Chapter XVII (17)
"And give unto one who is of Kin (to thee) that which is due"
and the Prophet asked as to who was meant as "being of Kin". the Angel
named Seyyida Fatimah (3AS) and told the Prophet to give Fadak to her (3AS) as
the Income from Fadak belonged wholly to him on account of its being ceded
to him without the use of force. the Prophet (PBUH) accordingly bestowed
upon Seyyida Zahra (3AS) his estate of Fadak for the substinence of herself
and her children.
With reference to the above Quranic Verse, many Sunni commentators have
written that:
When the Verse was revealed, the Holy Prophet (PBUH) asked the Angel
Gabriel: "Who are the Kinsmen and what is their due?" The Angel
Gibrael replied "Give Fadak to Fatimah for it is her due, and whatever
is due to Allah and the Prophet (PBUH) out of Fadak, that also belongs
to her, so entrust to her also."
NON SHIA references:
- Tafsir Durr al-Mansur, v4, p177
- Kanz al-Ummal, v2, p158
- Sawaiq al Muhriqah Chapter 15 p 21-22
- Rozatul Safaa vol 2 p 135
- Sharah e Muwaqif p 735
- Tareekh Ahmadi p45
- Ruh al ma'ani, vol 15 p 62
And for ADDITIONAL references one can go to
- Commentary of the Quran by Fakhr al-Din al-Razi
, v8, p125 (Under the Tafseer of Surah Hashr)
- Sawaiq al-Muhriqah by Ibn Hajar Haythmi, p21
It leaves no room for us to believe that the Land of Fadak was not the
personal belonging of Seyyida Fatimah (AS)!
Seyyida Fatimah (as) raised a voice when Fadak was stolen from her, protesting to
Abu Bakr, she said:
You have taken over possesion of Fadak although the Prophet
had gifted it to me during his life time.
On this Abu Bakr asked her to produce witnesses of the gift. Consequently,
Imam Ali (as) and Umm Ayman gave evidence on her favor. (Umm Ayman was the
freed bond maid and the dry nurse for the Holy Prophet (PBUH& HF), She was
the mother of Usamah ibn Zayd ibn al Harith. The Holy Prophet usted to say
Umm Ayman is my mother after my mother. The Holy Prophet (PBUH& HF)
also bore witness that she is among the people of paradise.
NON SHIA references:
- al Mustadrak, vol 4 p 63
- History of Tabari, vol 3 p 3460
- al Istiab, vol 4 p 1793
- Usud al Ghabah, vol 5 p 567
- Tabaqat, vol 8 p 192
- al Isabah, vol 4 p 432
Lets please stop focusing on bashing anyone.
When you deal with people who have no adab or manners or respect for differnces, its really a waste of time to even engage them.
If you want to talk about issues, talk about the merits of ahlul bayt (3as) and why it is is important for us to follow them, and why they were the maintainers of the prophet's (saw) sunnah after him, rather than attack the Sahaba, unless someone has a legitmate question or issue.
For more info and references I can provide them if someone is interested.
from >>> www.khomainy.com (where khomeini cites Abu Bakr's hadith)....first YELLOW highlighted text says:
"and the scholars are the inheritors of prophets, and the prophets do not inherit a dinar nor a dirham, but they give 'ilm' (religious knowledge) in inheritence, so whoever acquires from it...he acquires an ample share"
then the RED highlighted text is where Khomeini judges the hadith and (WAIT FOR THE BOMB........):
"all the hadith's narrators are TRUSTWORTHY"
#: #: #: #: #: #: #: #: #: #: #: #: #: #: #: #:
WHATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT??????????? ??????
yes, Shia, khomeini rules that Abu Bakr's hadith is AUTHENTIC :D
but in the other page he cites the usual weak Shia argument against the hadith!!!
funny how contradictory the clown was!!!
and here is a translation of Khomeini's confession of his own ignorance and misguidance ..as found here >>> www.khomainy.com
"O scholarly hawzahs, O universities of people of tahqeeq ...rise up and save the Qur'an from the evil of the ignorants and the scholars who attacked and continue to attack the Quran deliberately and with prior knowledge, for I seriously say (and not for the sake of 'regular acquaintence') that I am sorry for my life which has gone in waste in the path of misguidance and ignorance"
ah, love u Shia when u run away!..... looool
5 years of Ali being caliph...WHY in the world did he NOT restore Fadak????
If it was the rightful inheritence of Fatimah, his wife, but she died without getting it for the alleged conspiracy against her by the Sahaabah, then ..doesn't the husband inherit his wife? Why didn't Ali do that when he was the head of state?? :)
Guess what?? Khomeini cites the hadith Abu Bakr cited to prove his position on Fadak,..Khomeini cites it when it agrees with a goal he wanted to attain (proving "Wilayat ul-Faqih"):
here is the page showing he cites Abu Bakr's hadith >>> www.khomainy.com
and this is the cover of the book where Khomeini is CAUGHT employing Abu Bakr's hadith to reach rulership in Iran >>> www.khomainy.com
and the HYPOCRITE Khomeini in another book..grades that "Abu Bakr hadith" inauthentic (yes, after citing it in another stupid book of his....read by his stupid followers)...only because the 'context needs this' :D :
the page >>> www.khomainy.com
the cover >>> www.khomainy.com
But don't be so shocked. the destroyed Rooh ul-Shaytan (Khomeini) was very ignorant and misguided, he even ADMITTED THAT ON HIMSELF....AND THAT HE WASTED HIS LIFE IN IGNORANCE AND MISGUIDANCE!!!!
LOOK >>> www.khomainy.com
from the book >>> www.khomainy.com
Sorry, Mehnaz, I know you are a lover of Khomeini, but truth is...you need to find yourself a Shia Arab to make sure SilkySword is saying the truth! Khomeini admitted wasting his life in misguidance (dalal -or 'zalal' in Persian :p) and ignorance / jahl :)
KharaNaseeb (Naseeb's Sh!t), you didn't show us ur ugly face in my other posts, man, esp. on the one thing u like most about being Shia (mut'ah)! Your fella who's name starts with 'p' (forgot his stupid name) wrote a journal titled "Sunni Version of Mut'ah" then disappeared after I slapped him there several times and very very very hard, ....why didn't you, Supershia, save him there? The guy stopped commenting there, awwwww, what a pity!!! How could you let one of ur religion's pillars (mut'ah) be demolished so easily by a Wahhabi??? #:
Show us the knowledge, without using Asif_Ali's ("you were caught mistranslating and cutting sentences"), that clown..I wanted him to show me his "knowledge" on that abovementioned p's journal :)
And good luck with a well explanation for the pics above, and the scans :D ...how much time u want? I could have given u the time u usually spend doing mut'ah in bed! what do u usually pay the shia hooker for? an hour? ..want an hour, baby, to answer? :)